Real cases · Real families · Real consequences

Inheritance Wars

When family, money and the law collide.

Inheritance Wars examines real disputes over wills, estates, trusts, inheritance and family property which have reached the courts.

We look at what happened, what the court decided, what the dispute cost — financially and personally — and what families and their advisers can learn from it.

But every case also raises another question:

Could there have been another way?

Litigation sometimes provides an answer which only a court can give. But inheritance disputes can also consume estates, damage families and continue for years.

Inheritance Wars therefore examines decided cases through another lens: could mediation have helped?

Winning an inheritance war is not always the same thing as resolving one.

Mediation does not mean compromising every case. It means asking, before the parties commit themselves to the full cost and risk of litigation, whether there is a solution which the court could not impose.

Inheritance Wars: The Husband and Wife Who Died Together — and the £300,000 Question of Who Died First

Featured Inheritance War

The Husband and Wife Who Died Together — and the £300,000 Question of Who Died First

Scarle v Scarle

A husband and wife were found dead in their bungalow. Nobody could establish which had died first. Each had a child from a previous relationship. The answer determined which family inherited their jointly owned assets.

79 & 69 · £300,000 at stake · One rule from 1925

Explore the Inheritance Wars

The case library

Many cases raise more than one issue and appear under several headings.

These cases are exceptional. Inheritance disputes aren’t.

Individual reported cases can appear extraordinary.

But the wider trend is significant.

Probate Registry figures obtained through Freedom of Information requests show that the number of probate caveats entered annually increased from 6,358 in 2010 to 11,328 in 2025 — an increase of approximately 79%.

Meanwhile, reported data indicate 1,217 disputed probate cases were filed in the High Court in 2025, compared with 816 in 2020.

A caveat prevents a grant of probate being issued without notice. It records that someone wishes to be notified; it is not itself a contested probate claim, and the two datasets are collected on different bases.

Read: Inheritance Disputes Are Rising →

79%

increase in probate caveats since 2010

11,328

probate caveats in 2025

1,217

High Court disputed probate claims filed in 2025

What the cases have in common

Different families. Different law. Familiar patterns.

The unexpected will

A family member discovers that the deceased’s final arrangements are very different from what they expected.

The family home

Property carries an emotional significance far beyond its market value.

The promise

Someone believes years of work or care were given in reliance upon an assurance about the future.

The estrangement

Years of difficult family history are compressed into witness statements and legal submissions.

The absent witness

The person whose intentions everybody is debating is no longer able to explain them.

The costs

A dispute about an inheritance gradually begins consuming the inheritance itself.

Could mediation have resolved it?

Not necessarily.

Some inheritance disputes genuinely require judicial determination. Questions of capacity, fraud, ownership, construction or the validity of a will may sometimes need a judge to decide them.

Mediation does something different.

It allows the parties to ask not only:

“Who is legally right?”

but:

  • “What happens if I am wrong?”
  • “How much will proving this cost?”
  • “What will be left of the estate?”

and ultimately:

“Is there an arrangement we can all live with?”

That is why mediation can be particularly effective in inheritance disputes.

It allows legal rights, litigation risk, money, property and family relationships to be considered together.

A court and a mediator ask different questions

The court

  • Who is legally right?
  • Is the will valid?
  • Was there capacity?
  • Was there undue influence?
  • Was a promise made?
  • What does the document mean?
  • What order does the law permit?

Mediation

  • What matters to each person?
  • What are the risks if nobody compromises?
  • What will another year of litigation cost?
  • Can property or money be divided differently?
  • Can the family create an arrangement a judge could not order?
  • What outcome can everyone live with?

The court decides the legal dispute. Mediation can explore the human and practical one.

What can mediation do that a court cannot?

Inheritance disputes are rarely only about law. They may involve homes, farms, family businesses, promises, personal possessions, relationships, grief, and competing ideas about what the deceased really wanted.

Keep a home

A beneficiary might remain in a property for life or for an agreed period.

Divide a farm

Different parcels of land can potentially be allocated between family members.

Structure payments

A settlement may involve lump sums, instalments or deferred payments.

Preserve a business

Shares or control can potentially be reorganised without destroying the underlying business.

Protect a vulnerable beneficiary

Appropriate trust or payment structures may sometimes form part of a settlement.

Deal with personal possessions

Family photographs, jewellery, furniture and sentimental objects may matter far more emotionally than their financial value.

Keep the dispute private

Mediation is confidential, subject to the applicable mediation agreement and legal exceptions.

Address the relationship

A court determines rights. A mediation can also allow people to explain, acknowledge and sometimes repair what happened.

The precise legal, tax and practical consequences of any settlement require appropriate professional advice. The mediator does not provide legal advice.

When should you mediate an inheritance dispute?

There is no single correct moment. Mediation can take place:

  • Before proceedings
  • After initial disclosure
  • After the parties have exchanged their cases
  • After expert evidence
  • Before trial
  • During an appeal

The important question is often not “Is the case ready for mediation?” but:

What are we waiting to learn before we can have a useful negotiation?

Anatomy of an inheritance war

How disputes usually unfold

  1. 1

    Death

  2. 2

    Surprise

    “That’s not what I was told.”

  3. 3

    Suspicion

    “Something isn’t right.”

  4. 4

    Solicitors

  5. 5

    Positions harden

  6. 6

    Proceedings

  7. 7

    Costs escalate

Court

A judge decides

or

Mediation

The parties decide

The earlier mediation is considered, the more options may remain available. Mediation works best alongside proper legal advice, not instead of it — parties should understand their position before deciding how to resolve it.

PC

About the author

Peter Causton

Barrister · Mediator · Founder of ProMediate

Peter Causton writes the Inheritance Wars series for ProMediate, examining decided inheritance, probate, trust and family property cases from the perspective of litigation and dispute resolution.

Inheritance Wars provides general information and commentary on decided cases and mediation. It does not constitute legal advice. Every inheritance dispute depends upon its own facts and applicable law.

© 2026 ProMediate (UK) Limited. All rights reserved.